Reading Time: 7 minutesIntroduction On 14 March 2019, the Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) reprimanded and fined UBS AG and UBS Securities Hong Kong Limited (collectively, “UBS”), Merrill Lynch Far East Limited (“Merrill Lynch”), Standard Chartered Securities (Hong Kong) Limited (“Standard Chartered Securities”) and Morgan Stanley Asia Limited (“Morgan Stanley”) a sum of HK$375 million, HK$128 million, HK$59.7 […]
香港：如何避免婚前资产纳入离婚程序？
Reading Time: 1 minutes香港的楼价持续高昂，有能力自置物业组织爱巢的年轻情侣或新婚夫妇并不多，因此近年出现一种现象，就是子女婚后与伴侣跟其中一方的父母同住，或者由父母「资助」子女置业的首期。
在离婚案件中，如何判断婚前资产的真正实益拥有人，往往是个棘手的问题。在YKYM v YMCT [2013] HKEC 487一案中，家事法庭就需要裁断双方在伦敦的婚姻居所究竟是母亲送给儿子和媳妇共同享有结婚礼物，还是只是交由他们以信托形式代她持有。
HONG KONG: What can you do if a camera in a taxi or hailed car captures your private actions and the video goes viral?
Reading Time: 5 minutesIntroduction Video cameras have been installed inside some taxi and hailed car compartments in Hong Kong for security and safety purposes. They would record the video images of the passengers. Some unscrupulous drivers might share or upload the recorded video clip online to social media or sell the clip to a media company without any […]
香港：前雇员申请类似专利，雇主可如何追究？
Reading Time: 1 minutes在Acron International Technology Limited v Chan Yiu Wai & Anor HCA 1709/2010（裁决日期：2016年1月25日）一案中，原告人成功控告一名前雇员在终止受雇后，申请一项与原告人开发的技术相似的专利，这是原讼法庭首次就《专利条例》第57(1) 条作出裁决。
案情重点
原告人是一间在香港注册、从事科技行业的创新企业，第一及第二被告人为其前雇员。两名被告人于2004年10月18日递交辞职信，并于离职后8日，即2004年11月26日，在中国内地共同提出专利申请（「被告人申请」），最后于2009年1月7日获授予专利。
HONG KONG: HKEx’s censure of Golden Meditech and censure/criticism of various directors
Reading Time: 6 minutesIntroduction The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited censured Golden Meditech Holdings Limited (the “Company”) (stock code: 801) and a number of its current and former directors for committing numerous serious breaches of the Listing Rules in relation to the disclosure and shareholders’ approval requirements as well as the directors’ ability and the failure to […]
香港：工作场所的性骚扰──雇主为何应关注？
Reading Time: 1 minutes于2015年7月29日，平等机会委员会（「平机会」）公布，已根据《性别歧视条例》（「该条例」）在区域法院代表一名女士（「申索人」）向其前雇主（「雇主」）提出法律诉讼，追究雇主：(i) 须就其雇员作出的非法性骚扰行为负上转承责任；及 (2) 由于申索人提出性骚扰投诉（「该案件」）而令她遭到受害歧视。
HONG KONG: Trademarks with vulgar meaning may be invalidated in the PRC
Reading Time: 4 minutesIntroduction On 3 February 2019, the Higher People’s Court of Beijing Municipality (“Beijing High Court”) handed down its judgment and determined that the trademark “MLGB” had a vulgar meaning, was of low style, and may endanger the socialist morality; and therefore shall be invalidated in accordance with Article 10(8) of Trademark Law of the People’s […]
香港：申请宣告父母身分与婚姻诉讼程序中的「密切联系」测试是否相同？
Reading Time: 1 minutes根据香港法例第179章《婚姻诉讼条例》第3(c) 条，如欲在香港提出的离婚程序，至少其中一方必须与香港有密切联系。过往的离婚案例显示，法院在判断有没有密切联系时会考虑所有相关因素，例如在香港居住多少时间及拥有多少资产。值得注意的是，上诉法庭在近期一宗案件中，将离婚案件的「密切联系」测试的适用范围大幅扩大至其他家事案件。在WSJ v WZC [2019] HKCA 89一案中，一名母亲（「母亲」）代表其未成年儿子（「儿子」）根据香港法例第429章《父母与子女条例》（「该条例」）提出申请
HONG KONG: A US short-seller was held liable for disseminating a false online research report about a Hong Kong listed company
Reading Time: 6 minutesIntroduction A US short-seller, Mr Andrew Left (“Mr Left”) of Citron Research, was held liable by the Market Misconduct Tribunal (“MMT”) in August 2016 for publishing false or misleading market information about Evergrande Real Estate Group Limited (“Evergrande”) (Stock Code: 3333). In February 2019, the Court of Appeal (the “CA”) dismissed Mr Left’s appeal against […]
Hong Kong: Is the test for “substantial connection” for the declaration of parentage the same as that for matrimonial proceedings?
Reading Time: 4 minutesIntroduction In respect of initiating proceedings for divorce in Hong Kong, section 3(c) of the Matrimonial Causes Ordinance (Cap. 179) requires either of the parties to have substantial connection with Hong Kong. There is a line of divorce cases showing that the Courts in determining whether a connection is substantial would take all relevant factors […]
香港：第二次机会──推翻认罪答辩的法律原则
Reading Time: 1 minutes在某些罕见情况下，被告人虽然有代表律师，但在作出认罪答辩前未获其律师提供适当意见（或被告人并无代表律师），则被告人可能需要以认罪答辩含糊为由，申请推翻其答辩。在最近HKSAR v Chan Chi Ho Lincoln [2018] HKCFA 64一案中，终审法院澄清了规管法院就被告人申请推翻认罪答辩而行使酌情权的原则。
香港：兼职引发的法律问题
Reading Time: 1 minutes不少香港公司规定，雇员若未作出披露或未经同意从事兼职，即属违反合约，可能会面临纪律处分、解雇，甚至被起诉索偿。兼职亦可能触犯《防止贿赂条例》内的刑事罪行。
雇佣合约或人力资源政策须列明准则，规定雇员就其收受的利益及任何外间薪酬（包括兼职）作出充分披露，以及订明审批权谁属。就相关政策提供培训、加深雇员的认识、制订审批权，以及建立申报外间工作的机制都是关键所在。